The MB BF90 should not be a disappointment, you say the Maintenance cost were high what did you base this on? The only maintenance cost should be on Belts and small wear parts that are inexpensive and quick and easy to change.
It sounds like you may have been using the Bucket Crusher incorrectly.
The magnets are an excellent partner for the crushers it keeps up the health and safety, e.g. keeps people in cabs and away from plucking the steel out of the crushed piles. As the Bucket Crushers have been built as totally a one man one machine.
If the angle of the mouth were opened as you mentioned the product would be to big to pass through the jaws and then you would have to tip out the product and start the process again. The Mouth is 900mm wide right through the jaws, thus if it fits in the mouth it will be crushed. Regards to the hoses maybe the hoses were to long, they sound as though they should be shortened with just enough room to fully crowd the bucket both ways not extremely tight but enough to not become a problem with rebar. We use protective grading on all our hoses that helps the wear and tear also.
These crushers have a wide range of use, they can be working on a demo site one day and the next they can be crushing in a quarry crushing rotten rock for dairy farm tracks. These do handle the concrete rail way sleepers even though the sleepers have stress wire and create havoc through ever traditional jaw crusher. The BF70 can do two sleepers in under 30seconds which is effortless.
we tested the BF90 last year, but was rather disapointed, based on the price and maintenance cost.
Maybe it was the wrong debris tested, but it produced far less than promised.
Magnet and the heavy duty version is a must. The angles on the bucket should be a little better to ease picking up larger chunks of concrete. The hoses should be better protected (have to be really careful with the rebar).
I guess its well suited if the debris should have a low grade distribution or in demolition where large chuncks are natural available (eg demo of prefabricated structures, sleepers etc).
Hi guys,
Just some info for you re the bucket crushers...
The BF120 (the largest model) can process up to 50m3 per hour and will go on a 30-35 tonne excavator. There are three other smaller models as well.
Check out http://www.bucketcrusher.co.nz for more details... they now have a "heavy duty" version of both the BF90 and BF120 and some videos as well if you would rather see a demo of them working.
Here is one of a bucket crusher being used to crush a power pole, pretty impressive.
1:04 AM
Transform waste building materials into valuable aggregate for use in building projects or for resale using our portable mini concrete crushers. Recycle brick, blocks, concrete, kerbstones, marble and granite, paving slabs, stone and any other rock found in the UK at a rate of up to 15 tonnes per hour.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional in Electronics products.
I am using the Red Rhino Crusher's and I love them.
1,Mini Mobile Crushers for the Building Industry : Red Rhino Crushers 2,Red Rhino Crushers
10:15 AM
Yeah, this bucket crusher isn't meant so much for high production or to make spec product; it's meant more for reducing material on smaller jobsites ... to increase hauling capacity, use as onsite fill -- or sell, if you don't need spec product. Its production rates aren't huge. But if you don't want to bring in a separate portable crusher (or crushers), it does work well -- because it's an attachment.
You have to be careful in using a jaw crusher as your primary and finishing crusher. Jaw crushers make a very slender, elongated product. This is fine for some farmer or some company who has a very, very loose spec.
Typically, jaw crushers are used as primaries that feed a secondary crusher which does the final shaping and sizing.
The best "bang for your buck" crusher would a horizontal shaft impact crusher. It has a high reduction ratio, excellent particle shape, and you can recirculate oversize off a screen and send it back to the crusher. The big disadvantage to a HSI is the operating costs ($.10 to $.25 per ton) and maintenance. Even a small 40"x34" HSI can reduce 20" concrete to -3" (90% under -1") at a rate of 75-100TPH.
Of course, if money was no object, you would run jaw crusher to screen to cone and back to the screen.
1:54 PM
The US Web site has been suspended. But for the amount of work it seems to do (15 tonnes per hour), a bucket crusher might be a better answer; check out this Web site:
It's a jaw crusher that mounts on an excavator as an attachment. Its tons per hour rates are from 15 to 90, depending on the model.
Anyone seen this before? Whats the price on this machine? Bulldog Crusher USA - Technical Data
Most Users Ever Online: 429
Currently Online: John
61 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 54
Members: 3042
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 17
Topics: 20012
Posts: 28246
Newest Members:
Doug, David Groves, David Groves, Arthur Smiths, BUTRUS WOLAdministrators: JOHN: 7602, John: 7010