Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —





 

— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_TopicIcon
Service Contract Act vs Davis Bacon Act
April 27, 2006
8:05 AM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 5298
Member Since:
August 29, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You learn something new everyday here (I hope)

Good information to pass along!

April 26, 2006
7:51 AM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 573
Member Since:
October 7, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

A lot of remediation and emergency work falls under the SCA too. The President can suspend the Davis Bacon Act, like he did during the cleanup after Katrina but only an act of Congress can suspend the SCA.

April 25, 2006
4:01 PM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 817
Member Since:
January 12, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I didn't know that, I thought Davis Bacon applied to all govt work regardless. Good to know the real skinny.

April 25, 2006
9:17 AM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 573
Member Since:
October 7, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I learned something new this morning (new to me anyway). The Davis Bacon Act doesn't apply "if the contract is solely for the dismantling,demolition or removal of improvements unless further work will result in the construction,alteration or repair of a public building or public work at that location is contemplated...." The Service Contract Act (which is a whole nother kettle of fish) applies.
I am starting a job for the Navy this week. We didn't bid to a full specification but rather to a scope of work. I erroneously thought that since it was a Federal project that the Davis Bacon Act applied, so when I bid the project I downloaded the applicable wage determination and used that to compute my labor costs.
Since nothing is going up in place of these outdated structures, I was informed in a meeting this morning that we were working under the Service Contract Act instead.
I also learned that the contracting officer is always referred to in written communication as the "KO" to distinguish him/her from the "CO" which is reserved for the Commanding Officer of the installation.
(I think it is time to go home now :) )

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 429

Currently Online:
89 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

James: 5298

demobud: 817

Robert Kulinski: 573

1Pyro: 548

autoparter: 534

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 54

Members: 3042

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 17

Topics: 20012

Posts: 28246

Administrators: JOHN: 7602, John: 7010

Skip to toolbar