That is a great question. I don’t know if we have lost touch in a sense. It is just the way things and technology is going. With buildings getting built closer and closer together, the industry has to come up with new ways to combat these things.
I think some of it is that XYZ Company has one so now for me to compete I need one also. I have only seen a couple of projects that used them and they were effective, but I think that was mainly the operator. Like demobud I have seen them used on a couple of projects and thought what the heck are they doing.
Just to play devils advocate I suppose you could say that the technology creates a new skillset that must be learned. That being said, I see where you are coming from; I guess it has a lot to do with a company's bottom line. I know I can't afford one so I tend to stick to what I can reach, so to speak. I have used high reach equipmenet in the past and am ambivalent. I have seen them used correctly and seen them used where they were absolutely unecessary.
I have seen many high reach excavators. For the life of me I can't see the cost justification versus the dependabilty and usage. I saw 1 that crashed like a computer, 1 that had a rotating shear that was being fixed more than used and 1 that took an Einstien to get the proper angle because the rotation would free swing.
I've wrecked 2-8 story buildings with a 400 Komatsu and a bucket, both in Hospital environs. I demo'd a 9-story hotel the same way. Are we losing touch with true demolition techniques? Does this loss justify the high $$$$ for high reach vs. crane?
Most Users Ever Online: 429
Currently Online:
36 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 54
Members: 3042
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 17
Topics: 20032
Posts: 28266
Newest Members:
Doug, David Groves, David Groves, Arthur Smiths, BUTRUS WOLAdministrators: JOHN: 7602, John: 7030