6:33 PM
September 22, 2006
The only things left were old furniture nothing important..And yes we are realy busy...I will be using a 330 hitachi to take the building down..It is constructed of a steel supported roof and load bearing block walls..The real test are the 2- 50 ton overhead cranes in the 3 story section and making sure all the homeless people are out when I start to wreck. Pics will be in pic gallery
3:11 PM
The nightclub Nation in DC became very famous for hosting all night "Rave" parties where kids stayed up all night doing drugs. Must have been fun. Any remnants left behind when you cleared it out for demo?
It does sound like you are busy. What material is the boiler plant built from? What are you going to use to take it down?
7:51 PM
September 22, 2006
Im sory about the pics..they put me over in South East DC Taking down a 3 story night club called Nation..Its a good size building it was an old boiler manufacturing plant.I covers about a 1/2 block..I just started gutting it out last week I hope to start wrecking Tuesday or Wednesday...I will post Pics.
11:19 AM
Just my view of the situation. It appears if you have the financial wherewithall and the knowledge/experience then you can justify a longreach. If you don't, then you tend to denigrate the advantages of such a machine. If you wish to bring down an eight story building floor by floor, I wish you the best. We just brought down an eight story building, tight quarters etc. in 2 ten hour days. Salvage/Debris was loaded out by a minimal crew in 4 days. I didn't have to wear myself out building ramps, exposures were easily protected and 32,000 square feet a day was left in the rubble pile. In any event, I used to work for a fellow who used a shovel when a backhoe was nearby, a peavey when a crane was nearby and wrecked and loaded with a crane and clam bucket when an excavator was nearby. How times change!
I would have to assume that if you can justify the cost over a long term basis, kudos to you. It appeared to faciltate a particular need immediately. I just hope it doesn't get rusty in the yard.
Mazzochi/LVI seem to keep their high reaches busy.
I can still floor by floor quicker and trip more square feet in a day than any high reach. Red Mandell can prove the same doing floor by floor too! He's the best at it.
When you can demo about 32,000 sq.ft. a day of an eight story (heavy r/c)with your high reach call me. I'd enjoy doing the time study for you!
Although our machine is not a true "highreach" it did cost me $55k to put together on our base machine giving us 45' of working reach with a 200. We just used it to remove 22,000 sf of exterior stucco off of plywood in about 24 hours. The formula looks like this. $$+$$$=$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. And if you calculate in the fact we haul this machine behind our hooklift requiring only a $28.00 permit you can throw a few more of these in the bank $$$$$$$$.
5:44 PM
High reach not always necessary. I watched an amazing job go down with a CAT 365 downtown today. The operator built a huge ramp with debris from the neighboring building that he had just demo'ed and cleverly used that to climb up to reach up to the fifth story of the building he was tearing down. The 365 did the job perfectly, with no high reach or extended boom necessary. Just awesome to watch the power in that 365 machine too.
My Greek partner, Nikos, has truly impressed me with the execution of multi-stories demolition with minis. He came over and assisted me with a seperation on an 8-story hospital in Memphis. I was nicely educated on simplicity and economics.
I watched him do a 5-story in Thessaloniki, Greece at a rate of a floor every 2 days until it was excavator height. Saved alot with just the minis...fuel, space, efficiency and time.
Most Users Ever Online: 429
Currently Online:
29 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
2 Guest(s)
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 54
Members: 3042
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 17
Topics: 20032
Posts: 28266
Newest Members:
Doug, David Groves, David Groves, Arthur Smiths, BUTRUS WOLAdministrators: JOHN: 7602, John: 7030