OPEN BIDS

Fireballs

February 27, 2007
7:07 AM

1Pyro

Member

Forum Posts: 548

Member Since:
October 25, 2005

Offline

Agreed. It just doesn't look environmentally pretty.

February 27, 2007
5:27 AM

rdz

Member

Forum Posts: 198

Member Since:
December 29, 2005

Offline

That and you have the unsightly problem of the debris pile on fire after the shot.

February 26, 2007
12:54 PM

1Pyro

Member

Forum Posts: 548

Member Since:
October 25, 2005

Offline

Agreed Blast1. In the State of New Jersey the use of a hydrocarbon effect would be considered a hazardous spill ( anything greater than one quart). They could call in the Hazmat Team. Surprised

January 31, 2007
6:01 PM

blast1

Member

Forum Posts: 120

Member Since:
April 29, 2006

Offline

Fireballs!!!! Linears, Det-cord, Nonels and the like make enough flash and bang for free. I know of no explosive demolitionists that need additional liability with "fireballs".
Your statement may have been better presented by "suggesting" that if shooters would appreciate an environmental friendly sideshow to try your idea.
I appreciate the idea though! There are many variables also!

January 17, 2007
3:59 AM

1Pyro

Member

Forum Posts: 548

Member Since:
October 25, 2005

Offline

Why is it that everybody in the blasting industry seems to use hydrocarbon based fireballs, they produce that thick black smoke. Most people in the pyro field have switched to cremora coffee creamer in a 5 gallon plastic bucket with 8 oz of 4 F black powder on the bottom for lift, its evironmentally friendly and produces one hell of a fireball that has no flaming residue.:spinningsmile:

All RSS

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 429

Currently Online:
113 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)