Outselling is one thing. Underhanding is another. When someone sneaks in the back door and keeps the buyer blindfolded...it is not capitalistic, it's gray area communistic. We always invite Owners/Architects to call our competitors. We even give them the phone numbers for our competition! Foolish... maybe, ethical...100%! Competition comes from more than 1 person vying for the same trophy. Is this the case?
I can say "let the contractor decide", you can say "let the architect/engineer decide"......
In my opinion I'm right. In your opinion you are right. That is why we have Democrats and Republicans, why we have forums such as this to express our opinions and experiences, it's called freedom of choice!
If someone outsells the product I am selling, good for them. If I outsell the competion, good for me. Last time I checked, the good old USA was still a capitalist society.
I forgot, if you think I'm being untruthful, you're wrong. I hired an attorney to find out I'd be wasting any more money trying to fight. I apologize for changing the subject.
I'd prefer having Engineers or Architects writing specs. They have to account for any errors or omissions. We don't, we just get the extras!
The whole project seemed to fly under the radar for ethics. The project seemed to just "slip" unde the City of Indianapolis "legal" wire for consultation without bid number. If I remember correctly, it was about $300k. Funny, I bid $90k for the same work and was told the project was "negotiated. Oddly enough. The contractor tolr me last month he would rather have had taken the dome down with a ball instead of the aggravation caused by poor fragmention. Call Curtis Schopp and verify this.
The Market Square Arena shot went just fine. The pile was high due to the fact that there was a reinforced concrete tunnel running through the center of the building. If you ever saw it, you would most certainly remember you could drive under the building on a City street. Again, as you remember, that road had every utility you could think of underneath. All of which were to remain live throughout the project. The building collapse as far as it possibly could. Everyone knew the tunnel was to remain, there were no surprises for anyone.
Remember this, rfk, they asked us. If they asked you, would you say no?
The extra is not something I would share to strangers or the internet, none of my or anyones business.
We will have to disagree about the design issues. Many of the stadiums are forced to tight schedules and separations or adjacent operations like the subject project.
As you have pointed out if it were not for the often time "free of charge" collaboration that designers count on, many other extras would be paid on the shoulders of tax payers.
The first time the owner tried to forbid blasting and forced an improper method. The plan was to try and used a shear to cut the center ring. Blasting was clearly the right choice.
The second time they created two seperate GC packages one for the blasting and one for the prep/cleanup. This created an obvious finger pointing arrangement. No lawsuit was ever filed. The PM works for our firm and I bid the job both times.
The real problem was the project design tried to dictate means and methods. RDZ you hit it on the head very few engineers/architects have the experience to write a good spec for large demolition projects such as stadiums.
Most Users Ever Online: 429
Currently Online:
116 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 54
Members: 3039
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 17
Topics: 19932
Posts: 28166
Administrators: JOHN: 7602, John: 6930