Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —





 

— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

This topic is locked
sp_TopicIcon
RCA Dome Demolition
April 9, 2007
11:51 PM
Avatar
Wolf
Guest

Nice. Great picture, too.

What's the strategy from this point forward.

April 2, 2007
5:43 AM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 198
Member Since:
December 29, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

So you are saying that everytime the phone rings, you say "Wait, let me give you some other people to call."?

Please do not question my ethics. Would you be offended if I questioned your religious belief?

March 30, 2007
11:09 AM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 120
Member Since:
April 29, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Outselling is one thing. Underhanding is another. When someone sneaks in the back door and keeps the buyer blindfolded...it is not capitalistic, it's gray area communistic. We always invite Owners/Architects to call our competitors. We even give them the phone numbers for our competition! Foolish... maybe, ethical...100%! Competition comes from more than 1 person vying for the same trophy. Is this the case?

March 30, 2007
5:50 AM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 198
Member Since:
December 29, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I can say "let the contractor decide", you can say "let the architect/engineer decide"......

In my opinion I'm right. In your opinion you are right. That is why we have Democrats and Republicans, why we have forums such as this to express our opinions and experiences, it's called freedom of choice!

If someone outsells the product I am selling, good for them. If I outsell the competion, good for me. Last time I checked, the good old USA was still a capitalist society.

March 29, 2007
7:53 PM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 120
Member Since:
April 29, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I forgot, if you think I'm being untruthful, you're wrong. I hired an attorney to find out I'd be wasting any more money trying to fight. I apologize for changing the subject.
I'd prefer having Engineers or Architects writing specs. They have to account for any errors or omissions. We don't, we just get the extras!

March 29, 2007
7:38 PM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 120
Member Since:
April 29, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The whole project seemed to fly under the radar for ethics. The project seemed to just "slip" unde the City of Indianapolis "legal" wire for consultation without bid number. If I remember correctly, it was about $300k. Funny, I bid $90k for the same work and was told the project was "negotiated. Oddly enough. The contractor tolr me last month he would rather have had taken the dome down with a ball instead of the aggravation caused by poor fragmention. Call Curtis Schopp and verify this.

March 29, 2007
11:57 AM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 198
Member Since:
December 29, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I am not straying. They asked us for a price, we gave them one, they gave us a contract, we shot the building. It was their decision, their money. We did not write the specs.

I still stand by my original post: Let the contractor's decide.

March 29, 2007
6:49 AM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 198
Member Since:
December 29, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The Market Square Arena shot went just fine. The pile was high due to the fact that there was a reinforced concrete tunnel running through the center of the building. If you ever saw it, you would most certainly remember you could drive under the building on a City street. Again, as you remember, that road had every utility you could think of underneath. All of which were to remain live throughout the project. The building collapse as far as it possibly could. Everyone knew the tunnel was to remain, there were no surprises for anyone.

Remember this, rfk, they asked us. If they asked you, would you say no?

March 28, 2007
1:29 PM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 8
Member Since:
October 19, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The extra is not something I would share to strangers or the internet, none of my or anyones business.

We will have to disagree about the design issues. Many of the stadiums are forced to tight schedules and separations or adjacent operations like the subject project.

As you have pointed out if it were not for the often time "free of charge" collaboration that designers count on, many other extras would be paid on the shoulders of tax payers.

March 28, 2007
5:59 AM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 8
Member Since:
October 19, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The first time the owner tried to forbid blasting and forced an improper method. The plan was to try and used a shear to cut the center ring. Blasting was clearly the right choice.

The second time they created two seperate GC packages one for the blasting and one for the prep/cleanup. This created an obvious finger pointing arrangement. No lawsuit was ever filed. The PM works for our firm and I bid the job both times.

The real problem was the project design tried to dictate means and methods. RDZ you hit it on the head very few engineers/architects have the experience to write a good spec for large demolition projects such as stadiums.

March 27, 2007
10:36 AM
Avatar
Member
Forum Posts: 198
Member Since:
December 29, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Maybe they should leave that up to the demolition contractors? They usually know best.

This topic is locked
Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 429

Currently Online:
116 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

James: 5298

demobud: 817

Robert Kulinski: 573

1Pyro: 548

autoparter: 534

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 54

Members: 3039

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 17

Topics: 19932

Posts: 28166

Administrators: JOHN: 7602, John: 6930

Skip to toolbar